2 Replies Latest reply on Jun 2, 2021 8:53 PM by jyoti singh

    Wrong corrections, missing residue

    Alfred Schmidt New Member

      Good evening to all,

      I would like to report here an example of cases which in my opinion are incorrectly handled by Informatica.

       

      case 1)

      result:

      StatusCode = 100

      StatusMessage = OK

      ProcessStatus = C4

      MailabilityScore = 4

      ResultPercentage = 63.99

       

      Original address (request):

      street = Händelstr.

      house number = 5

      postal code = 35279

      city = Neustadt

      country =Germany

       

      Updated address (response):

      street = Händelstr.

      house number = 5

      Adresszusatz =

      postal code = 31535

      city = Neustadt am Rübenberge

      state = Niedersachsen

      country = Germany

       

      The transmitted street and postal code match the specified city and it should not lead to a wrong correction that only changes the postal code even if the combination of city and street would be possible in another postal code. The transferred data would have to be prioritized here, if available.

       

      Furthermore, I would like to report a problem with Residue:

       

      case 2)

      Original address (request):

      street = transPAL Mönchebergstr.

      house number = 12

      Postleitzahl = 34125

      Ort = Kassel

      state = Hessen

      country = Germany

       

      updated address (response)

      street = Mönchebergstr.

      house number = 12

      postal code = 34125

      city = Kassel

      state = Hessen

      country = Germany

       

      In this case there is no entry for residue. I think there should be (transPal).

      It would be nice if you could optimize this and when making corrections that remove words (strings) or numbers from the street, also return these removed elements as a residue in the response. For all I care it could be an optional setting for the interface which is activated by a request parameter.

       

      thank you and best regards

      Alfred

        • 1. Re: Wrong corrections, missing residue
          Namratha Dhoolipalla Guru

          Hi Alfred,

           

          Are you using the AV transformation or the AV Cloud Web Service?

          What is the mode of validation that you are using?

           

          Thanks,

          Namratha

          • 2. Re: Wrong corrections, missing residue
            jyoti singh Seasoned Veteran

            Hi Alfred,

             

            As per my understanding:

            For the first address:

             

             

            street = Händelstr.

            house number = 5

            postal code = 35279

            city = Neustadt

            country =Germany

             

            Whenever the matching scope is set to Street/Delivery point level, the preference would be given to Street and house number details. In this case, the same street 'Händelstr' is present under two postcodes '35279' and '31535' but house number '5' is present only in '31535' and hence corrections and made concerning it.

             

            Whereas if you try checking for the house number '3' or '6', these are present in the postcode 35279 and it is getting validated as well without any modification in the postcode.

             

             

            For the second address: The provided street name is incorrect and changes are made to it as part of the correction and those values would not be moved to the residue. The addresses where entire fields are getting dropped can expect those values to be present in the residue.

             

             

            Hope it helps!

             

             

            Regards,

            Jyoti